if y play sit n go's then yes, 4+1bb per limper. and so on
Results 11 to 20 of 25
Thread: PP PreFlop Strategy
Hybrid View
-
05-13-2013, 07:32 PM #1
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Posts
- 143
-
05-22-2013, 05:24 PM #2
- Join Date
- May 2013
- Posts
- 4
All of your exclusions dictate what you should be doing bra. There is no absolute way to play those hands man. You can raise 77+ with position and limp the rest if the implies are there dude. Otherwise yas folds it.
-
05-14-2013, 03:29 AM #3
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 1,587
The position and stack sizes matter. For instance, if I'm sb vs bb, I'd say all in is in order if I'm seriously short stacked.
-
05-14-2013, 09:07 AM #4
I would limp...massive bets get called by massive donks almost always
-
05-20-2013, 01:19 PM #5
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Posts
- 105
fold fold fold fold bluff fold, a wise man once said dunno hoo
-
05-21-2013, 03:41 PM #6
- Join Date
- May 2013
- Posts
- 41
I basically just move in with JJ+ on a low stack. You can really beat yourself up trying to outguess everyone once the flop comes.
You are better off going all in instead of missing the flop with half your stack in the pot and more players to deal with also.
~SwordCall
-
05-21-2013, 05:14 PM #7
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Posts
- 41
Pretty impossible question to answer without the variables that are asked to exclude........................................... ..................................
-
05-21-2013, 05:17 PM #8
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Posts
- 41
In tournaments, consider the percentage of your stack and the opponents stack in this calculation. If you are risking less than 10% of your stack and if you lose, you still have over 50bb, I would consider it worth the risk only if our villian is deep as well.
-
05-21-2013, 05:15 PM #9
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Posts
- 41
Set mining can be very profitable only if you will get paid. If Villian has AK and wiffs with a 972 board and you have duck duck, you will likely only get a cbet and not his entire stack....
-
05-22-2013, 03:47 AM #10