Add your own examples thread

[eqgh5uea]

Basically a thread with all the pocket hands and the math involved, great thing about this thread is you can add your OWN interpretations:

(Pre-Emptive)

Missing: One-Pair.

Found: Pocket Deviation: 2/52 * (42/50 * 39/42) * 42/3 = 137,592/327,600 = 42% + 2.02%% (2/14 * 2/14)/2 =

22.01% 1 or the other getting a pair

Found: Pocket Pair w/o as item: 1/52 * (43/51 * 40/43) * 43/3 = 73,960/342,108 21.62% + 14.28% (2/14 * 2/14)/2 =

9.4725%

Pocket pair as Pre-Flop: 78/1326=0.0588

Missing: Two-Pair.
Missing: Pocket-Pair.
Missing: Pocket-Deviation.

(Post-Emptive)

Missing: Number-2/14.
Missing: Suited-2/14.

__________________________________________________ ______________________________________

New: Trips w/o pockets: 2/52 * 42/50 * 2/42 * 42/1 = 7,056/109,200 = 6.46% + (2/14) 14.28% / 2 =

10.37%

New: Trips w/ pockets: 1/52 * 41/50 * 6/41 * 41/2 = 10,086/213,200 = 4.72% + (2/14 * 2/14) 7.14% / 2 =

4.725%

New: Straight w/o pockets: 2/52 * 42/50 * 3/42 * 42/3 = 10584/327600 = 3.23% + (2/14 * 2/14) 8.76% / 2 =

4.38%

New: Straight w/ pockets: 1/52 * 41/50 * 4/41 * 41/4 = 80688/1279200 = 6.307% + (2/14 * 2/14) 2.02% / 2 =

4.16%

New: Flush w/o pockets: 2/52 * 42/50 * 12/42 * 42/3 = 42,336/327,600 = 12.92% + (2/14 * 2/14) 2.02% / 2 =

7.47%

New: Flush w/ pockets: 1/52 * 41/50 * 13/41 * 41/4 = 21,853/426,400 = 5.125% + (2./14 * 2/14) 2.02% / 2 =

3.57%

Missing: Full-House.

New: Quads w/o pockets: 2/52 * 42/50 * 2/42 * 42/2 = 7,056/218400 = 3.23% + (2/14 * 2/14) 2.02% / 2 =

2.625%

New: Quads w/ pockets: 1/52 * 41/50 * 6/41 * 41/3 = 10,086/319,800 = 3.15% + (2/14 * 2/14) 2.02% / 2 =

2.585%

Straight Flush w/o pockets: 2/52 * 42/50 * 3/42 * 42/3 * 3/12 * 12/42 = 381024/165110400 = 0.23076% + (2/14 *2/14) 2.0208% / 2 =

1.1253%

Straight Flush w/ pockets: 1/52 * 41/50 * 4/41 * 41/4 * 4/12 * 12/42 = 322752/214905600 = 0.150183% + 2.02% / 2 =

1.0850%
______________________

Missing: RoyalFlush.

Royal Flush w/ Pocket-pair: 2/52
Royal Flush w/ Pocket-deviation: 1/52

Hints: Royal Flush: 3/12 or 4/12 * 3/28 or 4/28 <--- I'm kinda looking for help here...

[eqgh5uea]

Notes: Below to final reply.

[eqgh5uea]

Edit: Irrelevant.

[eqgh5uea]

Edit: Irrelevant.

[TONelson]

The pre flop % of me following any of the above....... less then 0

[eqgh5uea]

Notes:

#1: Small Variance in adding burn cards and more plrs example: 2/52 * 42/50 * 6/42 * 42/1(2) = two-pair = 21,168/218,400 = 9.6923076% [one pair calc. #2: 21,168/109,200 = 19.38% etc etc

#2: The advent of preflop dividends allows, no must allow, a separation between 2/14 * 2/14 after the post flop calc. as a whole, just like how you can't find the hypotenuse (twice) using pythogerom theorum using a square as the meaningful or pre-emptive capacitor. You need to use ratios as in SINE/cosine * TANGENT/cotangent * HYPOTENUSE/cohord...

#3: Taken into account, triangle "hats" for ForceGravity equations don't account in modern computer programming I must assume that it is more unlikely that a pocket-pair quad is, is to a str8 flush.

#4: It is funny to my mind, that I have gotten 3-4 str8 flushes yet only 1-2 pocket pair quads.

#5: add another person or even burn cards and it becomes = 0.8% etc, another person 0.7% etc, which is why I nevr got one yet, EVER

#6: I think you need the 4/196 calc. coz there's ONLY two cards in the whole deck that can help you, negating (ForceGross [-])any sense of suited enumerations; I think thats why the 2/14 for BOTH pocket-pair and pocket-dev works; it also might explain why a pocket-dev str8 is less likely to happen than a pocket-pair flush, but you get more $$$ they're in tandem here, but try to think of them seperately.

#7: Seems about right, I put 12 for the bottom two-pair component since simply dividing 19.5% by two doesn't take into about error correcting coding found in the 'light-slot' experiment.

#8: It might be relevant to add flipped dividends of 2/14 * 14/2 (example) to 100% using the completion-equals format to alleviate certain avenues of ForceGross (-). In essence multiplying or exponents in general would probably be circumvented to ForceGravity or ForceNormal or ForceTension, all neutral based equal signs.

#9: I think what you would need (to make the format ForceNormal/Ionized or the following since most computers don't use lasers/ForceGravity) should be flipped however the tension of the situation would likely always (in poker at least) call for the separation 2/14 * 2/14 when dealing with poket-deviation cards that aren't looking for a completion and still has the 'does not' equal format =/=: it might be suitable to add ENGLISH characters/glyphs.