ok
his bet size on the turn represents a progressive bet
so if he isnt bluffing that means that his hand is already made,
so its liklely that the 9 doesnt make a difference. i think that an average player would do that with a pair of tens,
so you should not have folded especially because it was only 180 more to call, and if you were right (which i think most likely you would be) you would take down a 2k pot.
think about it 190 more for 2k
it seems like a good call to me,
if he bet like 2k then you would have had to think about it,
but for 190 more i would have called with a high in the hopes it is a bluff.
Results 11 to 13 of 13
Thread: what would you do
-
09-20-2011, 06:44 PM #11
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Posts
- 307
-
09-20-2011, 07:12 PM #12
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Posts
- 1,677
At that point, for only 190 more, and given your stack size, I would have called. The 190 would have been worth the information to find out if he was bluffing or maybe semi-bluffing until the river.
-
09-22-2011, 02:28 AM #13
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Posts
- 100
what actually made me fold was the river bet of all in which would have left me broke i got impression like you say he had a ok hand hand aand was trying to keep me in betting until river were i felt there was a high risk of him having a straight so i folded had if i would have felt that i could have afforded to lose the bet i might have gone for it.it was the difference between me finishing hand with 2k stack on a fold or 6k with a winning or 100 odd chips with a losing one.