Quote Originally Posted by TheHaversham View Post
Just to follow up on this: keep in mind that when your game improves to the point where you are bringing your A-game every time, you're not going to stay in the micro's very long...hopefully. (Understandably, there comes a point where you're pulling checks offline, so you might hit a bit of a ceiling, but consistently solid play has rewards, one of which is moving up the ladder.) Win a freeroll and you're like, "zOMG!!!!...I won $10!!!!" and you're starting threads congratulating yourself. Win a micro and you're like, "zOMG!!!...I won $40!!!" and you're prone to letting your ego blow it in 4 $10 games at once. But get to where a win is substantial - relatively, like $300-$600, which is only substantial compared to when you were praying to cash for 30 cents in a freeroll - you start to think about how much of it can you take off and still be able to move up to better games without risking too much of your bank.

The easiest and most-profound BRM concept anyone taught me was to simply look at your own MTT Avg finish. Are you ITM above 10%? If so, how many of those are top-3 finishes? The higher those numbers go, the more of your bank you can risk in any one tourney. But now I'm off-topic, lol. What I'm trying to say is a lot of the players who should be green actually end up jumping out of their own league too soon and never get the chance to realize winnings. The players who can hold their ego in check, who can show up with their A-game every time they register, and who can sit on $500 as easily as they can $50, are actually pretty few and far between. And that's why we're taking note of those players. In the micro's, a green opponent should be considered formidable; they are the top of the micro food chain. But like anywhere else, just because they're good at poker doesn't mean they can be a consistently good poker player.



If I'm scanning over someone's stats, I might take note of things like how many rebuys do they play? Is the frenzy of a rebuy going to throw them off or are they used to that? Another good one is the ABI. I've found 3-betting light is usually much more successful when my opponent is playing well above their normal limits. Consider, if you (hypothetically) won a $1 satellite into the $215 Main Event of some series. 3-bets are going to give you much more stress than if you were playing a $1 Turbo.

I don't block my stats, but I see why some would, and like I said, it's generally because they are very good or very bad. In general, if you block stats on yourself, you often can't see stats of anyone else, either. So, if you have a HUD running and your HH database is like 3 million hands and you've got a good sample on most of your regular opponents (there are only so many Americans playing nosebleed stakes online these days, sadly), you might not need to opt in to sites like OPR or SharkScope. Also, if you like to talk shit and you're absolutely horrible and your stats show it, you might have been derided once or twice and just hid your stats out of tilt and frustration. Sure, there are exceptions, but not enough to worry about. I don't block mine because I'm neither very good nor very bad, and I use the sites often. What I don't do is allow a site to post Accolades next to my avatar or name. I don't want anyone to know how much rake I might pay, or that I won some freeroll or OPS game. What is the value in giving opponents that information other than simply stroking my own ego? To me, that is one reason why some females seem to play more consistently - I apologize if this seems sexist. I think a lot of testosterone-driven egos are killed by hubris, whereas women seem to be able to show a little bling without it going to their heads. It's like jewelry, maybe. They wear it to look pretty, but a lot of men wear it as status symbols. Again, there are always exceptions, but in general, a player who's proudly brandishing some icon that says they won a tourney last week is just vain.
Lol, I'm definitely that player that got excited over any little freeroll win, and now I get really excited about my $30 wins. But just a few weeks before black friday I really started understanding how important BRM is to being a consistently winning player. For me personally, following BRM is the only way to tell if I'm truly a winning player. I also decided that I would pull off 10% of whatever I won and use that as motivation to improve enough to at least have a 10% ROI to maintain my stakes and more to move up. So when I get excited over a little win, I'm excited that I'm making progress, not because of the value of the win. I guess I never realized how few people thought the same way. I really thought there would be more good players that just aren't comfortable at larger stakes so they keep playing the micros.

I wouldn't really be interested in blocking my own stats, because I've become a little obsessive about checking them now that I'm putting some volume on Merge and getting the occasional win. If I had any accolades I would go ahead and display them, because I like to use a little bit of truth to misguide my opponents. It's a habit I've picked up playing live since it's very easy for me to deceive the table as a young woman. Since I've started playing on PO and got to know some other female poker players, I have more respect for online female poker players. However, I have yet to play against another woman live that is any competition to me. My goal is eventually to play in the WSOP Ladies Event.

Instead of focusing on making it to the highest ranks of online play, I like to treat online poker as a training ground to become an excellent live player. My game has improved so much this last year and I'm really looking forward to my next trip to Vegas to see what I can do.