I agree JJ can be hard to play but if the reads you have on your opponents are decent enough, and you have a decent understanding of how to play winning poker, JJ should be a profitable hand in the long run. Versus a random hand, JJ has ~%77 equity.
Over my relatively small data set of hands I have been dealt JJ 53 times, voluntarily put money into the pot ~%94 of the time, and am winning ~%75 of those times.
Not sure if the other replies are serious or not (I really hope not) but both are pretty wrong...
Results 1 to 10 of 119
Thread: Pocket Jacks
Hybrid View
-
11-21-2012, 11:45 PM #1
-
11-22-2012, 12:02 AM #2
-
11-23-2012, 08:12 PM #3
Originally posted by dk12
honestly jj tt 33 66 kk aa its all the same shit....
Originally Posted by J_Slice
I agree JJ can be hard to play but if the reads you have on your opponents are decent enough, and you have a decent understanding of how to play winning poker, JJ should be a profitable hand in the long run. Versus a random hand, JJ has ~%77 equity.
Over my relatively small data set of hands I have been dealt JJ 53 times, voluntarily put money into the pot ~%94 of the time, and am winning ~%75 of those times.
Not sure if the other replies are serious or not (I really hope not) but both are pretty wrong...
I literally LOL when I read this. Focking hilarious. Thank you for the good laugh dk12.
-
11-27-2012, 05:00 PM #4
I could not agree more.In fact, I would have written a very similar response earlier if I wasn't so lazy. I think that more often times than not your hand isn't important. Start thinking about what your opponent has, and what your opponent thinks you may have. You have to understand that both of you are telling a story.