Total Free Money Earned

Redeems: $280,439

BTC Rate: $83045.67

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Seasoned Veteran
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    24

    Question 2

    PokerStars Hand #104547647508: Tournament #778159431, Freeroll Hold'em No Limit - Level III (40/80) - 2013/09/23 20:26:15 ET
    Table '778159431 1' 9-max Seat #5 is the button
    Seat 1: ansomar (3000 in chips)
    Seat 2: dosaa7 (7480 in chips)
    Seat 3: fathergoldie (2760 in chips)
    Seat 4: RESPED (2620 in chips)
    Seat 5: daddyshammer (2380 in chips)
    Seat 6: crixzus (3431 in chips)
    Seat 7: mffar (2320 in chips)
    Seat 8: jruizo (1640 in chips)
    Seat 9: edugis10 (5320 in chips)
    crixzus: posts small blind 40
    mffar: posts big blind 80
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to dosaa7 [8h 8s]
    jruizo: folds
    edugis10: folds
    ansomar: folds
    dosaa7: raises 80 to 160
    fathergoldie: folds
    RESPED: folds
    daddyshammer: calls 160
    crixzus: folds
    mffar: folds
    *** FLOP *** [2h Js Tc]
    dosaa7: bets 160
    daddyshammer: calls 160
    *** TURN *** [2h Js Tc] [Th]
    dosaa7: bets 160
    daddyshammer: calls 160
    *** RIVER *** [2h Js Tc Th] [Qd]
    dosaa7: bets 160
    daddyshammer: raises 320 to 480
    dosaa7: folds
    Uncalled bet (320) returned to daddyshammer
    daddyshammer collected 1400 from pot
    daddyshammer: doesn't show hand
    *** SUMMARY ***
    Total pot 1400 | Rake 0
    Board [2h Js Tc Th Qd]
    Seat 1: ansomar folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 2: dosaa7 folded on the River
    Seat 3: fathergoldie folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 4: RESPED folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 5: daddyshammer (button) collected (1400)
    Seat 6: crixzus (small blind) folded before Flop
    Seat 7: mffar (big blind) folded before Flop
    Seat 8: jruizo folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 9: edugis10 folded before Flop (didn't bet)

    Please advise about this hand

  2. #2
    PokerOwned God abwil2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,672
    Dont see anything wrong with either hand. You decided to bluff/steal with shit cards but you committed to the steal/bluff. Now if you had called with that trash then there would be something to talk about but since you didnt just call with trash you played it right. Second hand again as your other post you read it right and made the right play Good job!!
    Failing to Prepare is Preparing to fail : John Wooden

  3. #3
    PokerOwned God abwil2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,672
    Just for future reference you could have posted all three of the created threads in one thread and still got your 5 points each. No real reason to spam the board with hands when you could have posted them all in one thread..
    Failing to Prepare is Preparing to fail : John Wooden

  4. #4
    PokerOwned Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    281
    that and its just a raise not a re raise, and I dont like it, dont like it one bit

  5. #5
    PokerOwned Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    281
    that and its just a raise not a re raise, and I dont like it, dont like it one bit

  6. #6
    Elite PokerOwned Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    609
    not a fan of min raising, but +1utg with the amount of bb's u have isn't a bad way to decept your hand, and put in a raise. you could of just put out the flop a bet to try and take it down, and get info from the player.. but taking a free card or playing a small pot isnt bad .. the turn i would of diffenately fired a bullet, and not delivered a second check cause now when you re raise, your risking to many chips

  7. #7
    PokerOwned God
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    1,587
    You're reraise was questionable. It worked out for you but I think in the long wrong it's a mistake. Why not bet the flop though?

  8. #8
    I Gots You Dominated MovingFlea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    239
    On hand 1 why did you check raise? By check raising you are just putting in more chips in the pot than you have too without an actual hand. Open raising on the turn would have been optimal.

    Lets look at it this way and pretend you open raised the turn instead.

    If he has a King he is not folding, thus you can get away from a re-raise without putting more chips than necessary in the pot.
    If he has a small pair a simple open raise on the turn would take down the pot, no need for fancy check raises.
    If he is bluffing with garbage its unlikely he will re-raise you on a board that you probably connected with, a KQ board.
    If he has a Queen then that's the only hand you can outplay with a check-raise. Though not everyone would fold here.

    So you see a simple open raise would have taken care of most holdings. and done it without committing more chips than necessary. and I didn't even mention his possible flush draws or sets which you would have found yourself in a precarious situation.

  9. #9
    PokerOwned Pro
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    214
    I think there is nothing to discuss, things happen in the way he plays his chips and was wrong to defend your game ... regards

  10. #10
    I Gots You Dominated MovingFlea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    239
    That last hand. IDK man. A triple barrel on a board where he probably has something better is questionable. He's not folding a J, hes not folding a T and he's not folding a queen. Then again you probably know that.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •