Whcih is Better/ More profitable, Cash Gmes or SnGs (excluding 180 mans$) FOR PLAYERS WITH SMALL BANKROLLS

Cash games: Less upfront rake. More flexibility. More swings up/down. Greater variance as you're bad beats will generally lose you more of your BR than in an SnG structure. More players. Harder to keep BR management until you get $100 or above. Greater room for LAG players.

SnGs: Better player reads as you'll spend most of your time with the same players, unlike side games. Better BR management for amateurs as you know exactly pre session how much $ you're risking. Theoretically you can blow you're whole roll in one session in a side game. Experience, you can risk under 5% of your BR and only profit in less than 1/5 games and break even to being ahead. Great for beginners learning the game. Less rake in the long run.

I myself would be inclined to play SnGs for all the reasons above but especially because kf the BR mangement.

Please when responding give thoughtful input and not just 1 sentence answers, as this topic is key for all poker players. Advocate for one side or the othet or make a thoughtful comment.


Thanks,


GottimHimmel