Results 21 to 30 of 61
-
08-18-2012, 06:26 PM #21
-
08-18-2012, 06:32 PM #22
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Posts
- 64
The downside is as many have said, you have to grind a lot of them to make any real progress in building a roll. They arent bad to mix in every so often for practice but I wouldnt say they are worth it to play almost exclusive in terms of SNG's
-
08-18-2012, 06:40 PM #23
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Posts
- 234
i really dont bother with them its a very tightly played game and takes along time to cash
-
08-20-2012, 09:50 AM #24
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 328
downside is wen you can win in long run ...
-
08-20-2012, 09:54 AM #25
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Posts
- 51
rake doesnt make it truly a double up
-
08-20-2012, 09:59 AM #26
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Posts
- 23
you guys have no idea..
Man I miss Everest poker
They would have sng's with 9 people (for free) and prizes were 1st: 0,03 2nd: 0,02 3rd: 0,01
Than you could go to a sng of 6 or 9 people for a buy in of 0,05
and 0,1.. 0,25..0,5.. 1
That was a really easy way to get a bankroll.
Cant understand why people always love pokerstars for that 9000 people freerolls!
-
08-20-2012, 10:07 AM #27
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Posts
- 737
huy that bad but nothing to play for luck recover
-
08-20-2012, 10:29 AM #28
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Posts
- 221
I believe the collusion in these games are much higher then in regular Sngs
-
08-20-2012, 10:30 AM #29
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Posts
- 1,159
downside is wen i play sit n go...
-
08-20-2012, 02:05 PM #30
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Posts
- 131
If you're a consistent winner in the normal sng's no need to play the don's cause they will be less profitable for you but it's good to ppl who are building their bankroll...
Downside? P.e you risk 1$ to win max 2...So if you're the type of player that eliminates 4 players in a sng I find the 50/50 tournaments more profitable