no its not very good hand for playing for all your stake
Results 11 to 16 of 16
-
09-01-2013, 07:28 AM #11
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Posts
- 1,159
-
09-02-2013, 06:30 AM #12
I would not call an all in, assuming you are not committed of course
-
09-02-2013, 02:36 PM #13
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Posts
- 116
I would of folded probably on the flop jj so easy to beat in Omaha well any pocket pair that doesn't hot easy to beat especially with that much action I'm probably too patient with Omaha
-
09-02-2013, 02:39 PM #14
I would have folded this hand for sure even with the draws.
-
09-02-2013, 04:38 PM #15
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 78
Hell No!! Terrible starting hand and terrible flop for the hand..I don't care what the pot odds are here
-
09-04-2013, 04:36 PM #16
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
- Posts
- 133
well first of all, you probably shouldnt of put half your stack in pre to fold now... your kinda commited imo and even if someone has AAxx you have outs(ofc assuming you arent crushed in the club department) only guy i would be worried about would be the poopy guy who originally limped pre then potted it after significant action. Guys who do this tend to either have a bad AAxx that they didnt want to raise first in, or a gambly hand(i.e a ds rundown type hand) Even if by some chance you are behind AAxx or QQQ(postflop) you have your clubs to hit or even running str8 cards to possibly win... theres also the chance first shover has AA and the second guy has lowcards and is pushing with a wrap. you are getting a good price with your hand. the mistake was putting in half your stack pre, if you wanted to play the hand you shoulda shipped pre