Good Online Poker Sites

[ipoopchips]

I would say Carbon but ive heard great things about ACR. Considering moving my BR to ACR>

[RWPFhero]

For U.S. I would have to say the merge network or ACR.

[tp3rd]

Bovada treats me well

[ssuglia]

I would say Carbon but ive heard great things about ACR. Considering moving my BR to ACR>

There's not anywhere near enough traffic to make playing on ACR profitable.

The cash tables are softer than anywhere else I've ever played, but there's never usually more than 1-2 tables going at any particular level.

There really are no micro MTT's; the lowest regularly scheduled ones were $3-$5 buy ins.

I think the smallest SNG they have is $1, and it takes a while to fill.

[ChipGrindz]

ACR's smallest buyin is $1.50, so yeah not good for micro stakes

[gametime74]

no good sites at all..that all are bogus..play at your own risk

[Punter4444]

i think carbon is best not only for america but for many other also i got choice to play on any network ne poker site still i have play most on carbon because of fun factor.

[MIGO14]

There's not anywhere near enough traffic to make playing on ACR profitable.

The cash tables are softer than anywhere else I've ever played, but there's never usually more than 1-2 tables going at any particular level.

There really are no micro MTT's; the lowest regularly scheduled ones were $3-$5 buy ins.

I think the smallest SNG they have is $1, and it takes a while to fill.

Why the the traffic this low ? US players are restricted to a few sites, so I thought the traffic should be higher

[Petnicean]

Pokerstars is the best, i think!

[wwwrungood]

Why the the traffic this low ? US players are restricted to a few sites, so I thought the traffic should be higher

Yea, wondering the same. Overall, I dont think a lot of people trust these small sites. Its kinda like carbon and its traffic. Its been around for a while, but still not a huge traffic. A lot of advertising has to do with it, some people have never heard of ACR that have played on ftp or stars.