Carbon may really be rigged

[tp3rd]

If there is a pattern,then it is not random.........meaning rigged? Also ,can anyone deny the fact that the blackjack at carbon or any merge affiliate is not rigged!! That is so obviously fixed for the house that it should be criminal...or better yet dont even offer it!!

[1downswing1]

rigging poker what does it achieve jesus we all pay the same rake (micro) and to say a freeroll is rigged is laughable you should put in google BAD BEATS and watch live games

such nonsense

ps im not saying cheating isnt going on but that wouldnt concern a micro player would it

[abwil2]

For all those saying its not possible or wouldnt make sense have there minds closed to reality. Or they are the ones whos hands always hold up in BIG pots when they are favored or are donking others with their trash lol... All online software is designed to "promote"gambling/action pots(or for the diehards setup hands).. Im not saying its rigged for any one in particular even tho it seems as the software picks and chooses who to favor each game or table. Low buyins or donk chasers do not change the odds, thats pretty plain and simple, yet in low buyins you see bad hands winning so much more often then best hand/favored hand holding up..The only tru shuffle is 7 shuffles with real cards not some fked up system(rng) that never shuffles. Theres nothing random about a system that doesnt shuffle the cards but instead uses a dozen or so decks of cards. I guess its much harder to create a rng that uses 12 decks or more vrs one deck getting shuffled. Cause the system they use is much more complicated then just shuffling the godam cards that we are playing with. Yeah seems to hard to me LMFAO
I always love that statement of how if you complain about a site being rigged you must suck LMFAO funniest line EVER!!!! Seriously? REALLY? So then how can one be a winning player consistently live and yet be just a casher with no big scores online? I know im well over 5 digits in winnings live but cant beat a donk online. Donks are supposed to be the bread and butter of poker right? so why arent they online? Cause then these sites would only have decent to good players playing, Donks would just plain give up like they do live, Now there are alot of donks live but they are the ones who refuse to believe they suck that bad and have plenty of money backing them up.. Average income Joe(and by average i mean POOR) doesnt keep playing once he sees he doesnt have the skills or luck to be a winning player yet online they reward them more often then the decent solid/selective agressive players to keep money flowing in. Cause them donks will eventually lose it all but thats a long term outcome and means nothing in the short term when they are donking there way to a win... Im a winning player live by far and im a positive roi player online but just cant get any good cashes except for when the first black day occured in poker when most sites (besides PS and FT) quit allowing US players to play on there site. I had 14 mtt wins before that and none since. The outcome of donks hands winning have changed drastically since that day some 4 or 5 years or so ago..

I dont think that these sites have picked and choosen certain people to just win(even tho it seems like it) but they have changed the rng to promote dumb(bingo style) gambling. The rng is set for action not to be just random. If it was they would have just programmed it to shuffle the deck ur playing with instead of using 12 or more decks to play one hand.

[lulabell79]

For all those saying its not possible or wouldnt make sense have there minds closed to reality. Or they are the ones whos hands always hold up in BIG pots when they are favored or are donking others with their trash lol... All online software is designed to "promote"gambling/action pots(or for the diehards setup hands).. Im not saying its rigged for any one in particular even tho it seems as the software picks and chooses who to favor each game or table. Low buyins or donk chasers do not change the odds, thats pretty plain and simple, yet in low buyins you see bad hands winning so much more often then best hand/favored hand holding up..The only tru shuffle is 7 shuffles with real cards not some fked up system(rng) that never shuffles. Theres nothing random about a system that doesnt shuffle the cards but instead uses a dozen or so decks of cards. I guess its much harder to create a rng that uses 12 decks or more vrs one deck getting shuffled. Cause the system they use is much more complicated then just shuffling the godam cards that we are playing with. Yeah seems to hard to me LMFAO
I always love that statement of how if you complain about a site being rigged you must suck LMFAO funniest line EVER!!!! Seriously? REALLY? So then how can one be a winning player consistently live and yet be just a casher with no big scores online? I know im well over 5 digits in winnings live but cant beat a donk online. Donks are supposed to be the bread and butter of poker right? so why arent they online? Cause then these sites would only have decent to good players playing, Donks would just plain give up like they do live, Now there are alot of donks live but they are the ones who refuse to believe they suck that bad and have plenty of money backing them up.. Average income Joe(and by average i mean POOR) doesnt keep playing once he sees he doesnt have the skills or luck to be a winning player yet online they reward them more often then the decent solid/selective agressive players to keep money flowing in. Cause them donks will eventually lose it all but thats a long term outcome and means nothing in the short term when they are donking there way to a win... Im a winning player live by far and im a positive roi player online but just cant get any good cashes except for when the first black day occured in poker when most sites (besides PS and FT) quit allowing US players to play on there site. I had 14 mtt wins before that and none since. The outcome of donks hands winning have changed drastically since that day some 4 or 5 years or so ago..

I dont think that these sites have picked and choosen certain people to just win(even tho it seems like it) but they have changed the rng to promote dumb(bingo style) gambling. The rng is set for action not to be just random. If it was they would have just programmed it to shuffle the deck ur playing with instead of using 12 or more decks to play one hand.

But how do you really feel about it? ~lol~ Well said.

[kiddaa]

It does seem like it sometimes. But I have to also think that you just get to see more hands online than you do live. Maybe that is a factor. I have had the same beats live i have had online. That goes for any site. I guess I need more data to conclude otherwise.

[Deadguy2]

its a the loose players that in the hand that make it look rigged if u have 4 players always calling chances are 1 of them is going to suck out against the best hand so its not the site its the players

[lulabell79]

its a the loose players that in the hand that make it look rigged if u have 4 players always calling chances are 1 of them is going to suck out against the best hand so its not the site its the players

Now that sounds logical (0=

[abwil2]

I guess the real main concern(for some of us) is none of these sites have a reputable audit company going thru there rng program. KGC can assign anyone they want but the KGC is just as much a joke as the bad beats themselfs. LOL

[tp3rd]

I guess the real main concern(for some of us) is none of these sites have a reputable audit company going thru there rng program. KGC can assign anyone they want but the KGC is just as much a joke as the bad beats themselfs. LOL

this ,without a doubt,is the best point/arguement so far!!! Thats why these "gaming commissions" if you want to call them that,are based on indian reservations,where they are free of legislations and jurisdictions of the country they live in. They can fix and make fake companies without fear of recourse!!

[eqgh5uea]

this ,without a doubt,is the best point/arguement so far!!! Thats why these "gaming commissions" if you want to call them that,are based on indian reservations,where they are free of legislations and jurisdictions of the country they live in. They can fix and make fake companies without fear of recourse!!

That's bullshit.

The fact that ndns can build embassies in other countries to deal specifically with them is hurting our country. I am Native American and I'm against it.

As for the rigged question, I think it probably isn't at some points. But to genuinely have a singular outlook, you have to play games that don't have any community cards like 5-Card Draw, Stud, or Razz.

Are the video games I play rigged when I know (in my gut) that my Panzer IV is gonna get killed with one shot rather than 3 or 4?---or when I know (in my gut) when there is going to be a burst of internet lag?

Call it intuition or psychic. We're all in this together when we play with community cards so being beat by 7-2os when the other player has that 'gut-feeling' can be reciprocated.

Now, are you one to have the outlook of "I'll never fold pocket Aces?" Coz if you are, then you've already lost. I fold AA, KK, QQ, on a regular basis. I've seen two-pair beating them so often I really don't regard them as all that good of a hand.