there is a disagreement between the 2, todd has paid roy $100 when the original deal was for $200, because he was trading for lock...so roy is now no longer down any money but feels he should get the $200 he was promised as par the trade, problem is no one has really come in to say who should get what...for how long the debt was there for i feel that roys midway comprimise for $50 on top is fair so i dunno
Results 11 to 20 of 58
-
12-11-2013, 02:35 PM #1117:51 <PooffyFooffy> not everyone screws up things the way I can20:27 <PooffyFooffy> I could use all the help I can get, lol<PooffyFooffy>lol I have my share of duh moments, regularly, lol
-
12-11-2013, 02:36 PM #12
I'm trying to understand the story? He paid the $100 owed and RH wants $50 in restitution? Or, he has yet to pay the $50 settled amount for an original $100 debt?
-
12-11-2013, 02:38 PM #13
its complicated original deal was $100 bcp for $200 lock...todd ran off with the $100 bcp
has since repaid that but roy wants the original amount of $200 from the trade (todd paid him in bcp)
he has since said he will accept a comprimise of $50 todd refusing to pay cuz he believes the debt is settled17:51 <PooffyFooffy> not everyone screws up things the way I can20:27 <PooffyFooffy> I could use all the help I can get, lol<PooffyFooffy>lol I have my share of duh moments, regularly, lol
-
12-11-2013, 02:43 PM #14
OK so, $100 bcp was paid on a debt of $200 lock? OK, so, tell RH to send me $100 bcp and I'll send him his $200 lock. Square rite?
I have nothing to do w/ this, but obv $100 bcp is at the least $500 lock in today's market. so, if RH wants the lock (which is doubtful) He, can easily trade the $100 bcp for way over $200 lock.
In this case, it looks like RH is looking for restitution which is fine but should have been worked out originally.
-
12-11-2013, 02:47 PM #1517:51 <PooffyFooffy> not everyone screws up things the way I can20:27 <PooffyFooffy> I could use all the help I can get, lol<PooffyFooffy>lol I have my share of duh moments, regularly, lol
-
12-11-2013, 02:56 PM #16
-
12-11-2013, 02:58 PM #17
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 2,926
1st of all the deal was 100 paypal for 200 juicy. 2nd royhobbs was paid 100 on bcp to settle the debt. and 3rd matter is closed. jaytodd is not paying him an extra penny on top. should he? maybe, but with all the threats and such from roy. id tell roy to kiss my ass also. guy is a nobody here as far as being able to ban anyone and whatnot
-
12-11-2013, 03:00 PM #18
- Join Date
- May 2013
- Posts
- 156
The point is JaytoddSCAMMER should be walking on eggshells the original deal was 100 for 200 several months ago.. This dipshit then ran and scammed me.. Then he shows up all high and mighty and sends me 100 of the 200 and acts all entitled and says I am not getting another dime.. For that I will not be happy until this SCAMMER is banned for life.. He has no right to act anything other then with remorse.. HE NEEDS TO BE BANNED END OF STORY!! THERE IS NO REMORSE HERE!!!
-
12-11-2013, 03:00 PM #19
100 PayPal for 200 juicy/lock? Who got scammed again?
Turtleboooy: lol when i come on i think f*** that Doc guy but i dont know why...haha
-
12-11-2013, 03:02 PM #20
- Join Date
- May 2013
- Posts
- 156