What do you like better omaha PL or FL?
Results 1 to 10 of 10
-
06-15-2013, 11:17 PM #1
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Posts
- 264
What do you like better omaha PL or FL?
-
06-15-2013, 11:19 PM #2
-
06-16-2013, 04:00 AM #3
no limit omaha is fun. quick easy to bust a roll.
This is getting old. Were sick and tired of the Spurs owning us. This is the year we ride up to the challenge, Get the monkey off our back! We Believe GO Dubbssss!!
-
06-16-2013, 04:03 AM #4
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 1,317
no limit. i hate pot limit. u can have a good hand and cant defend yourself. people will just keep calling with anything.
-
06-16-2013, 04:28 AM #5
- Join Date
- Jun 2013
- Posts
- 161
No limit but you gotta be able to take some deep swings because that game get volatile
-
06-16-2013, 05:51 AM #6
-
06-16-2013, 09:09 AM #7
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Posts
- 73
Fixed limit is very boring, especialy, pot limit is quite fun for me. Yes you can't defend your hand as good as you would want to but stakes can get very high very quick in pot limit play also it's just the tactics you should use are a little different. No limit is the best however.
-
06-16-2013, 09:10 AM #8
- Join Date
- Jun 2013
- Posts
- 13
I would have to agree that pot limit is fun, and in terms of getting people off of hands, limit would be predictable and boring, I myself would love to play pot limit...
-
06-16-2013, 09:23 AM #9
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Posts
- 76
I think omaha pot limit games are much better. A lot more decisions go into chasing draws and outs with a larger bets than limit
-
06-16-2013, 04:24 PM #10
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Posts
- 1,378
If its Omaha hi /low, I dont mind fixed limit. Regular omaha: pot limit.