treeman for mod

[oVITOo]

negative, i still disagree that mich was made mod (hes ok now but he still shouldnt be mod yet)
6 months isnt long enough on top of which zab only selects new mods when there needed and right now they arnt so sorry to dash your hopes i cant see it not yet

not sure how 'length of membership' has anything to do with being a quality candidate for mod. For example, you've been here over a year and I don't think you'd qualify for pokerowned janitor.

[treeman69]

not sure how 'length of membership' has anything to do with being a quality candidate for mod. For example, you've been here over a year and I don't think you'd qualify for pokerowned janitor.

lmao
+1

[Prawney]

As noted earlier i was a member for 41 days when i became a mod. However im one of those special cases where my leadership, strong morals and all around personality just jumped out from the screen and Zab had no other option than to make me a mod.

[azreal1]

not sure how 'length of membership' has anything to do with being a quality candidate for mod. For example, you've been here over a year and I don't think you'd qualify for pokerowned janitor.

simple, with length of membership comes knowledge and experience, the site has history ex members that need to be watched as they constantly try to rejoin for one reason or another, while it might not make u the perfect candidate and it isnt the only reason for being a mod...it helps personally i dont think people should be a mod here unless they have been a member for at least a year, because of the way the site develops and grows it can be to much for a n00b to handle

[Poof]

I don't think creating a thread like this serves a purpose. There has to be a need for more or to replace, there are many members that would make awesome mods, if Zab just added everyone, we would be over run.
Unless if you just wanted the members opinions, then I can understand that.