Originally Posted by
sickread23
Seems equally as stupid to have more money in LLB's, then is awarded for first place. You say many contradicting things. You say to play the free-rolls as if they were for a million dollars. I can't imagine if first place was for a million dollars I would have $20-$40 on LLB's. I think LLB's are dumb fwiw. That is not to say that I have not participated in them and won money from them. I had a 4 way 5,000 point LLB bet a couple of weeks ago. I am sure I may have convinced a couple of reg's that I let my grandpa play on my account. I played like 5 hands until I won the LLB. That is exactly why LLB's that mean more than a win are stupid. In fact when I play, I often look to see if someone has a big LLB bet running. If they do, I find another way to exploit them. In the end though, you have to realize that your opponents have to navigate the same field as you do. In the end, bad players should make you smile. I know that it can be frustrating in the heat of the moment; but deal with it. If you can't win more than average in these things, then poker isn't for you. You should be able to take the average prize pool and divide it by the average number of runners. Then time's that quotient by the number of tournaments that you have played here. If you have earned less than the sum of the aforementioned formula, then you need to work on your game. If that confused you..... well I digress.
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote