Results 11 to 20 of 25
-
06-10-2011, 11:17 PM #11
-
06-12-2011, 06:03 AM #12
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Posts
- 392
Yes, it's lame. I don't know any hardcore online poker player that is willing to go subscription.
-
06-12-2011, 06:04 AM #13
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Posts
- 438
wheres the link for the video?
-
06-12-2011, 07:47 AM #14
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Posts
- 117
Yes it's very instresting i totally agree.Poker is nice i love it.
Mike sextonnn
-
06-14-2011, 07:57 AM #15
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Posts
- 33
Neither i . But i will look for it.
-
06-16-2011, 02:34 PM #16
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Posts
- 395
I got free trial to PurePlay and it was ridiculous and I would have to think Sexton'ns site is better but it has to have a high% donkey count.
-
06-16-2011, 02:42 PM #17
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Posts
- 132
i agree with intelligent thought................they both are douche-bag sites...............(no offense)...............but they are..............listen to general consensus on here(they will never steer u wrong)
-
06-16-2011, 07:43 PM #18
i had a firned that tried the WPT thing like one year ago,,, but he said it wasnt worth it at alll> not even enuf tourneys to play at the time he could play them,,, i thiknk is a waste of money theree really>>
-
06-16-2011, 07:54 PM #19
-
06-16-2011, 08:01 PM #20
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Posts
- 392
I remember Sexton's NLOP site. You could play for free, but there were like 3 different ad banners going on at the same time, and you had to watch a 30 second commercial i believe during breaks. Was annoying, the games were soft... but actually winning anything is really hard. I won a satellite pretty easily but didn't bother to play the real tourney. It was for a 200 digicam but had like 500 players. I was too lazy. Winner take all tournies don't interest me. Also, people complained about how long it took to get your money. Think it was the standard 6-8 weeks but usually longer.