But in low stakes players are playing there cards more then what others may have, and not putting to much thought into the overall sitaution of the hand. And are more likely to call with hands that a avg. to good player may fold more often then not. Top pair even mid pair to a donk, bad player is the nuts. Knowing a person is weak is good... but when u try to push a calling station or donk off top pair which is near impossible it back fires.... You can know someone is really weak.. but in them spots u need to have a hand cuz they arent going to fold. I do understand both your reasoning though.
Check raising just seems to be more prevelant recently, also I do believe some players check raise because they wanna end a hand right then and there and go no further. Because the art of post flop play is lost.
Flat betting out when you hit a flip or miss it, is a lost art. Id say back when i started playing in 02 it was alot more prevelant.
Results 1 to 10 of 21
Hybrid View
-
08-21-2013, 05:34 AM #1
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Posts
- 25
-
08-21-2013, 05:39 AM #2
You're making some good conclusions, but try to think deeper about it. What's your goal in each hand? To get the most value when you're ahead and to lose the least value when you are behind. In cash games, that's all.
A player who can't fold, great I would never check raise bluff them, but when I had a set or something, bam their stack is mine. A player who is weak tight, but almost too able to fold to pressure is almost as bad. A check raise bluff with a flush draw or open ended straight draw, or even on a low board that never hit their range, is totally within reason. It's really about what is most profitable in each spot against each player. That's how to beat micro stakes.