some one who limps every hand?
some one who goes all in everyhand?
just a random i want your opinion thread... i know which i think is worse both pretty bad though
Results 1 to 10 of 41
Thread: Whos the worst out of these two?
-
01-29-2014, 07:31 PM #1
Whos the worst out of these two?
-
01-29-2014, 07:32 PM #2
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Posts
- 438
Limpers are worse for they hit their draws more than often. All iners usually lose and whine. Limpers eat u up
-
01-29-2014, 07:33 PM #3
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 969
def someone who limps every hand. going all in every hand is actually an ok strategy because it prevents u from making post flop mistakes and most spots in poker are marginal anyway
-
01-29-2014, 07:33 PM #4
the limper.... fish r the worst.
"Success is a science; if you have the conditions, you will get the results" -Oscar Wilde
MY CAPS LOCK IS BROKEN!
┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐
-
01-29-2014, 07:33 PM #5
some one who goes all in every hand,very annoying.
I am the Captain of my ship. If you don't like the ride, Get Off!
-
01-29-2014, 07:34 PM #6
-
01-29-2014, 07:34 PM #7
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Posts
- 690
Well I guarantee if its every hand the limper has a better chance.
-
01-29-2014, 07:34 PM #8
-
01-29-2014, 07:35 PM #9
-
01-29-2014, 07:35 PM #10
someone like durr who plays every hand is extremely hard to range and know where u stand in the hand. all inner's are a lot easier to beat IMO.