Sharkscope is a Joke

[azreal1]

best thing to do if ure trying to get stakes is to play consistantly well and get stakes of the po members or at least if u have never deposited explain this to would be staker and they would soon see that for someone who has never deposited to have "lost" x amount means u must of won it somehow and therefore cant be that bad...

[abwil2]

Yeah i always laugh at that too on sharkcope, it doesnt count you winning the sats just the losses and id rather them think im bad too

[credsfan03]

Sharkscope does not track private games or freerolls. I have never deposited on Carbon and just cashed out $600 but it only shows me as up $300.

[UnknownABC]

I was looking at my shark scope stats earlier and while I am not going to lie im not a superstar player, I am a good player. But I looked up my stats for Lock a site where I have never deposited on and it shows me as a $180 in the hole player. To me this is hilarious as all my money has been won through freerolls and thus at the very worst I should be at the break even point. The point is this, don't always take into account some independent sites stats when looking to stake or even judge a player because like I said earlier I am a good player but according to shark scope I am just straight up garbage.

The freerolls do not count towards your ROI because no money was invested.

[WILD]

PooffyFooffy is more than likely right. I'm not aware that statistic sites keep track of freeroll money. But, I am aware that if you cash in something like the vip freerolls on carbon, those winnings will show up on some sites.

[Wiresunderneath]

It is good that Sharkscope doesn't accurately reflect any semi-complicated things. That way some people will make incorrect decisions in your favor based on your crappy Sharkscope rating.