Has anyone noticed at all that playing on the client seems to be more like poker than the online money sites. I mean bad beats are less hands hold more often.
Results 1 to 10 of 11
Thread: poker client vs online sites
-
08-06-2013, 01:52 AM #1
poker client vs online sites
-
08-06-2013, 01:53 AM #2
and i dont mean bad beats like AA cracked imean like royal flush beat by 5 of a kind
-
08-06-2013, 02:04 AM #3
actually usually get my azz handed to me in plo in client but i'm glad you have had success. Online ring games are the same in my opinion.
-
08-06-2013, 02:04 AM #4
-
08-06-2013, 04:00 AM #5
- Join Date
- Jul 2013
- Posts
- 678
Client at any stake seems to be more like play money than any micro stake at any poker site IMO.
-
08-06-2013, 07:11 AM #6
Wish I could say - I have never gotten the damned client to work on my computer - tried it with 3 different browsers
-
08-06-2013, 10:24 AM #7
Play in client depends on the stakes and the game. If you compare the 100/200 NL table to online micro it's close to the same. PLO at 25/50 is equivalent to .01/.02 online. Stakes lower than this seem to be more comparable to play money.
Online stakes at 25NL and higher are going to play a lot different than anything in the client.When I looked up "Ninjas" in Thesaurus.com, it said "Ninja's can't be found" Well played Ninjas, well played.
-
08-06-2013, 12:11 PM #8
- Join Date
- Jul 2013
- Posts
- 31
There aren't as many people playing client as regular online rooms. So less hands, less bad beats. Plus if you are playing with your own points to make points you take things more seriously than your casual microlimit/freeroll player.
-
08-06-2013, 12:14 PM #9
wasnt really talking about that just ho
w the hands hold after your all in .And ty for your feed back
-
08-06-2013, 12:54 PM #10
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Posts
- 1,307
lol I guess thats because all the online sites cheats lol