Or you could look at it in the way that if someone is badmouthing a site they obviously have just suffered a beat or have some other reason to be mad at the site and then when they suffer a a fairly standard beat such as AK vs AQ or something along those lines they now believe that the site must really be against them. Do people not realise the only money these poker sites make is off of the rake so they have absolutely no motive to make people not want to play. Why would they screw over a certain player and therefore make that potential customer unlikely to not play anymore. I guarantee if u sit at home with a deck of cards and deal out hands face up and then deal flop, turn and river you will see beats just as bad if not worse than the ones you are complaining about.

If you cant deal with the variance of poker then dont get it in until you have the unbeatable nuts.