Quote Originally Posted by HopsnBarley28 View Post
This is heads-up, right? His move is NOT unreasonable - this is the same kind of faulty logic you applied yesterday. Any pair is pretty solid in heads-up. After your post-flop bet, his only real option is to fold or go all-in. You bet 25% of his stack, he's got a good pair in heads-up play. If he just calls, he's facing another bet on the turn, which he will probably have to call, which basically means he's pot committed. Like chess, thinking 2 or 3 plays out, the only logical choice is fold and fight later or go all-in.
My "logic" is faulty? At what point did I apply ANY logic to the hand? My first thread was just a steam-release about losing from a dominated position, and this was 24 hours later and I won from a dominated position. In neither case did I claim my opponent mis-played or played poorly. I appreciate you trying to "learn me," but that really isn't what I seek here.