Iddiots

[midaswell]

i figure that the sites are, like expressed already, trying to keep these players around to build their fees collected. i thought that rewarding stupid was just standard operating procedure. then i realized that that worked both ways. if a 'weaker player' is favored, then that must mean that i am considered a 'better player'. right? because i kept better starting cards. but then everything changed and the 7/2 offsuit won. so who is worse - him for challenging my aces, or myself for depending on them to win? or, in other words: round and round and round we go, and where we stop no one knows. I'M SO CONFUSED.

[Detroitjunky]

i figure that the sites are, like expressed already, trying to keep these players around to build their fees collected. i thought that rewarding stupid was just standard operating procedure. then i realized that that worked both ways. if a 'weaker player' is favored, then that must mean that i am considered a 'better player'. right? because i kept better starting cards. but then everything changed and the 7/2 offsuit won. so who is worse - him for challenging my aces, or myself for depending on them to win? or, in other words: round and round and round we go, and where we stop no one knows. I'M SO CONFUSED.

stop spreading rumors - the sites are NOT rigged to keep players around and build their fees - its such an outrageous but often spoken of claim and it needs to end now