Total Free Money Earned

Redeems: $280,439

BTC Rate: $98049.6

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 45
  1. #11
    PokerOwned Demi-God
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    810
    yes, i agree, if something has to be done, ( i like the structure the way it is) i'd vote for lowering the time for blind levels, i'd say 9 would be good enough, doesn't seem like they overlap that much.

  2. #12
    Zab
    Zab is offline
    PokerOwned Admin Zab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    7,256
    Quote Originally Posted by trubton444 View Post
    Lower the amount of ppl
    Uh no
    "And Shepherds we shall be. For thee, my Lord, for thee.
    Power hath descended forth from Thy hand. Our feet may swiftly carry out Thy commands.
    So we shall flow a river forth to Thee And teeming with souls shall it ever be.
    In Nomeni Patri Et Fili Spiritus Sancti."
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_AtUXdXA_s

  3. #13
    PokerOwned Master jbetta01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    312
    Quote Originally Posted by madjek View Post
    yes, i agree, if something has to be done, ( i like the structure the way it is) i'd vote for lowering the time for blind levels, i'd say 9 would be good enough, doesn't seem like they overlap that much.
    ive been at 2 final tables that ran over by at least 30 min
    poker terminology-
    Drawing Dead: If you call and hit your one outer.... I will kill you..!

  4. #14
    Zab
    Zab is offline
    PokerOwned Admin Zab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    7,256
    9 Minutes I don't think is enough, for the new promotions, we have to make sure we give it enough time..

    For example in 4 hours we get 24 blind levels
    at 9 minutes we get 26.6 blind levels
    at 8 minutes we get 30 blinds levels

    I think 8 would speed it up just enough.
    "And Shepherds we shall be. For thee, my Lord, for thee.
    Power hath descended forth from Thy hand. Our feet may swiftly carry out Thy commands.
    So we shall flow a river forth to Thee And teeming with souls shall it ever be.
    In Nomeni Patri Et Fili Spiritus Sancti."
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_AtUXdXA_s

  5. #15
    PokerOwned Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    311
    Quote Originally Posted by Zab View Post
    Uh no
    Rats

  6. #16
    PokerOwned Moderator CloudyMinded's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    489
    i agree..lowering the blinds would be better...try that first zab, before lowering chip stack

  7. #17
    PokerOwned Demi-God ssuglia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    811
    I'm sure I'm in the minority here, but I'd like to see the freerolls have 1500 starting chips. I actually liked it that way when it was tried out for a week or two a while back.

    20:52 <onehotdame> sug ...your the most helpful of Mods
    "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

  8. #18
    PokerOwned Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    357
    I agree Zab although I like the fact that the tournament plays like a real tournament ..to avoid overlapping I think the 8 mins would work fine.

  9. #19
    Elite PokerOwned Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    666
    Why not drop to 1000 chips that wud fix it

  10. #20
    PokerOwned God rrickir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    3,207
    Quote Originally Posted by madjek View Post
    yes, i agree, if something has to be done, ( i like the structure the way it is) i'd vote for lowering the time for blind levels, i'd say 9 would be good enough, doesn't seem like they overlap that much.
    i agreeee with that,,i just donttt like turbo type tourneys at all tho, and i hateed the 1500 stack tho too,, wss even more donking then,, was notgood. tho..

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •