Team LLBs

[ddavey25]

definatly dont want any collusion going on....but i dont see how thats avoidable when people can win together...I personally think i would want to lose a hand to my team mate to make sure I won a 1k llb...and i dont cheat so not sure the system will work.

[babyfaceatl]

They had a special event wsop 2009, where the buy in included four player team with jerseys and ur own team name. You could call time outs and discuss hands. Don't think it worked out well, wasn't played the next year.

[kiddaa]

maybe we should only allow up to 500 points in teams....what about the larger groups zab?

[MrPokerVerse]

Think the team game has its place, but this could really change lot of the dynamics here. Have to agree with soft play and collusion being a huge distraction from some pretty cool games already. My vote would be no to this. Granted I only play a few games now and then but really enjoy them as they are.

[Aligator8841]

very bad ideea colusion and soft play will be unavoidable

[kiddaa]

Yea maybe the team llb wouldn't work....What about the COD promo zab? Might be better for that. What about allowing the larger llbs?

[Zab]

Larger LLBs are allowed, theres no limit to the points you can bet.

The COD promo, It needs some serious love. I just envision me putting a TON of work into it and no one really caring about it. I need to make it more fun and more addicting

[Aligator8841]

cod promo??

[bigphatmike]

If its absolutely random choosing, maybe shown after late reg ends, if ppl start to abuse, then we could take it off.

[azreal1]

to the people that keep suggesting just taking it down if collusion shows....there is one major problem...if carbon sees collusion even in a "testing" stage then the people who are colluding will most likely be banned and zab and pokerowned will either be shut down or fined for encouraging it...really not worth the risk...i still say my leaderboard idea is the best BUT yes zab do work on cod it will be ossums