Should lilg get partial b2b for going 1 2 and losing to a sneak? take a vote!

[Drywallman3]

I agree with lilg. The sneak shouldn't have been in the tournament. Lilg knocked out over 25 players in the best night of his life. If Lilg doesn't deserve this prize pool, then I don't know who does. If lilg doesn't get awarded b2b, I probably won't play here again.

tootles

I was pulling for ya lilg but B2B means win 2 games in a row, sorry bud but my vote is no

[joshtheking]

no he shouldnt get it cause it wouldnt be fair to others

[scottieb668]

hell no!!!!! back 2 back is just that.. he should have played better and bet the sneak!!!!!!!

[Prawney]

well just can the b2b since it would never be fair as long as there are sneaks and come up with fair promo

What if during a nfl game in overtime when 1 team goes for field goal but wind was so strong the ball only went 10 yrds. Then other team going diff direction got a massive field goal because wind helped them along.

Are you gonna argue that the team who missed should get the win because its not fair that they lost due to the wind.

In essence its the same thing. An x-factor in the tournament that you have to overcome, and if u cant overcome it then you shouldnt be rewarded

[gametime74]

lil g is ok with me but b2b is b2b regardless who knocks him out, it sucks but thats the rules..

[rrickir]

i dont know but i think in some sports like track and running,, when someone get s disquialified for some reasons,,, then they move every1 up a place hi gher finish too.they dont rerun the race tho. so i dunno r eally here,,but some valid points can be made. I dont think he can get the w hole thing now, wouldnt be fair,rightn ow. BUT!! goin foraward i agree with acetoo really. due to open carbon to usa a gain and size of fr erolls and the amount of sneaks now,, i EVEN saw wagon complaing tday that 20% of poelple in tourey earlier were all sneaks, thats very high now and we alll know wagon rarely complains either! hehe. SO maybe goin forward on the b2b,, since cant s top so many sneaks now,, and will proly grow now too,, maybe the b2b rules need to be reevaluated,, now, in light of this. AND state before hand, tho. that if a sneak is left at the end ,,, then they dont count at all in the b2b, maybe.

[lilg97]

i know rikcki its bs but fuck it im good evern tho nobody killed th outrnies like i did i kod 50 ppl between both tournies and ge tnothin for it but who give a shit

[Prawney]

i dont know but i think in some sports like track and running,, when someone get s disquialified for some reasons,,, then they move every1 up a place hi gher finish too.they dont rerun the race tho. so i dunno r eally here,,but some valid points can be made. I dont think he can get the w hole thing now, wouldnt be fair,rightn ow. BUT!! goin foraward i agree with acetoo really. due to open carbon to usa a gain and size of fr erolls and the amount of sneaks now,, i EVEN saw wagon complaing tday that 20% of poelple in tourey earlier were all sneaks, thats very high now and we alll know wagon rarely complains either! hehe. SO maybe goin forward on the b2b,, since cant s top so many sneaks now,, and will proly grow now too,, maybe the b2b rules need to be reevaluated,, now, in light of this. AND state before hand, tho. that if a sneak is left at the end ,,, then they dont count at all in the b2b, maybe.

But in track and field and athletics 1 person doesnt affect the outcome. As in if person in 1st was DQ'd it can be argued that person in 2nd would have run the same time without the other person in the race. However in poker if the sneak wasnt in the tourney EVERY SINGLE HAND is different so outcome will be totally different and thats why you cant give lilg credit for coming 1st.

I really hate the way so many people are looking for ways to make things easier. So what if theres sneaks in the tourneys. The B2B is to win 1st 2 tournies in a row. Not any other combination of results sneaks or not is deservant of the prize.

Again about the number of sneaks in tournies. Am i the only one who reads chat after the start of every tourney where zab basically goes through all the sneaks and confirms that all but maybe 1 or 2 opted in but under a diff name. So they arent really sneaks

[rrickir]

well dont say u care lilg,, its ok to care, or else there wouldnt be all thes posts bout it i fel for ya BUT, zab cant do that after the fact tho,, somethin would have to be dcided before the g ames from now on,, as acetoo said,, whether to ignore the sneaks concerning b2b then.so everybody knows before game that they wont count then. casue there a lot now too.

[seaeyes]

no, I feel that the if a sneak wins then who ever finished 2nd (as long as their not a sneak) should be considered the winner and their go in the spot for BTB