Real po leaderboard---- roi, average money made per tournament played

[madjek]

ok, i've been asking zab to put this stat somewhere, instead we get final tables, but thanks to potfan, i never even thought to us ft's and itm% to get games played , which only stat we need to get the ave $/tourney played. I know it is all just a ballpark figure, but better than nothing, i am going to figure the ones i see, of course only ones who are on leaderboard for total money and final tables can be figured, and i have to get itm% from donkey bets or one of the others that lists it. If you aren't on here and have those 2 figures , you can post them and i can figure, or you can do it yourself.
Formula used: (total money won from fr's)/(tournaments played)

tournaments played = (final tables X 100)/(itm %)


here is what i have so far


gimmeabrew: $0.75
pokeyourface: $0.75
ddavey: $0.74
potfan: $0.73
madjek: $0.73
michman: $0.61
seaeyes: $0.49


i will edit as i get more info, if for some reason you don't want yours listed i will remove if asked.

[PokeYourFace]

mines is like $.74... i have 21% ITM

[potfan42o]

this is a cool thread be interesting to see who cracks $1+ a game average

[madjek]

mines is like $.74... i have 21% ITM

i've been rounding, so i get .75 for you if 21 is correct %

my guess before i started as to who would be highest was you, so we'll see if i am right.

i'll add to list, if itm is wrong i will correct, but you aren't reg in next tournament so i can't check

[xTom97x]

where is the final table stat?

[MichMan]

Like I was discussing with potfan last nite, the ITM displayed doesn't show decimals, so say someone (me) has a 24%, it could be anywhere between 24.001 to 24.999, so it stands to reason to use xx.5 as your ITM % in that formula to get a better approximation, not just a flat xx.00 %

[madjek]

where is the final table stat?

leaderboards, unfortunately , its only top ones, so can't do for everyone, hopefully zab will still do this figure for everyone eventually.

[PokeYourFace]

sharking, BPM, gimme will be better

[madjek]

Like I was discussing with potfan last nite, the ITM displayed doesn't show decimals, so say someone (me) has a 24%, it could be anywhere between 24.001 to 24.999, so it stands to reason to use xx.5 as your ITM % in that formula to get a better approximation, not just a flat xx.00 %

well i am assumming it rounds to nearest, not just truncates, so a 23.6 would list as 24, but idk, if you are sure it truncates then i will adjust.

[Drywallman3]

please remove mine thanks................