PokerOwned Madness Consolidated ideas

[rivdee]

Higher in the day is what player ratings does..

Think about it. If you finish #3 in a tournament with 30 players (lock) vs me who finishes #4 in a Carbon tournament with 80 players.

Who should advance? I should.. Bigger \ Harder field.. That's EXACTLY what the rating system is for

As a tiebreaker. Honestly, it's too bad we can't have an opt-in for the players so that they both consent to one tournament that day.

[Zab]

We've begun coding this...

[rivdee]

We've begun coding this...

Hell fucking yeah. Do I get a finder's fee pts wise for giving you the patent

[MIGO14]

Carbon for sure..

Debating on Lock & Juicy

BCP probably not because the results come in the next day..

well unfortunately then I am out of this...

[CUSTOMTABLES]

No way to stop that except don't suck in the first 10 minutes of a tournament during late registration. We had this issue with LLBs.

The only way to prevent this is to use the entire day's player rating system.. How you do throughout the whole day

yes sir

[Zab]

well unfortunately then I am out of this...

Still debating how I get BCP in there.. I dont get the results until the next day :| Sometimes later

[azreal1]

Still debating how I get BCP in there.. I dont get the results until the next day :| Sometimes later

i agree bcp should be left out purly because of the time delay on top of which the smaller field sizes etc its a bummer but until bcp get there acts together theres not alot u can do

[MIGO14]

well np, if its not possible atm, then maybe later...

[rghy2]

Agree 100%

I disagree for this promo, I should win. Instead of the total overall rating, I'm talking about whoever has the single highest finish as a tiebreaker. That keeps with the whole concept that one game can make or break you in the bracket.

[Prawney]

Are we still going to go with first tourney both people play H2H as the deciding factor with the other stuff like player ratings just a way of determining the winner when there isnt a H2H game played.