Seriously , i cant beleive a mod defends cheaters so much, i guess hes your friend irl or something. theswe two ppl are the definition on PO scum, them and all the underage and bashers should be booted
Results 61 to 70 of 105
Thread: Collusion?
-
03-24-2012, 09:22 PM #61
-
03-24-2012, 09:28 PM #62
See that makes no sense. Because if fury was so afraid of gimme and didnt want to call. Then when gimme said he would fold if fury calls, fury would have just called instead of shoving. No reason to shove because like i said in a cash game like this it is more likely gimme is angling fury then colluding against you. So to me this pretty much shows the fury didnt use what gimme said in making his decision
As for gimme its pretty obvious that he didnt let knowing fury had 10,10 change his actions as he called anyways.
Those were the 2 things that were said. And considering neither used any of the info given up when making their decisions its pretty clear they werent conspiring against you.
-
03-24-2012, 09:30 PM #63
-
03-24-2012, 09:31 PM #64
-
03-24-2012, 09:36 PM #65
its fucked up but it can go both ways, if it happened to me id be pissed but its w.e....no disscusion should be going on while a hand is in progress 100% not allowed but w.e
-
03-24-2012, 09:37 PM #66
lol i just realized prawn why is ur icon a shrimp lol....im sure ive noticed it b4 but i never asked why haha......
-
03-24-2012, 09:42 PM #67
You got me wrong. Im not defending cheaters. Because this is a case of you exagerating and making it like they were colluding against you, which from all the information available they werent. You are too close to the situation and arent looking at the hand objectively. If fury was so afraid of gimme he would have folded, definately wouldnt have shoved. What gimme said is more of an angleshoot, like saying something along the lines of " whatever u bet im calling". As a "true" and "real" poker player you should know not to take anyones word at the table as the truth so why would fury takes gimme word for the truth here.
The only thing wrong in the whole hand was mr fury saying what hand he had. But it didnt have an effect on what gimme did so its not collusion. What gimme did was an angle not colluding.
Your posts are almost showing that it couldnt be collusion because you just said that gimme had the draw that was the nuts for him. So he was never folding. And according to you what gimme said is the reason fury went all in. So in your own words Gimme had "the nuts for him" and his talk made fury shove. So going by what ur saying it looks like gimme got a guy to shove against him while holding the nuts. But that cant be right because i thought they were colluding against you???
-
03-24-2012, 09:43 PM #68
-
03-24-2012, 09:56 PM #69
@prawney, mrfury wanted information about the hand that is why he stated his hand. After gimmebrew gave him info he knew wat he wanted to do. He should have never pulled that move.
-
03-24-2012, 10:01 PM #70
Im just saying by your words not mine gimme had a straight draw that was the nuts and he wasnt folding. So by him giving fury the info he did that made fury think he was weak and shove. It seems to me that by what you said its clear that gimme was saying what he did to get fury to call/shove. Which means he was angling fury not colluding against you.