No one should discuss hole cards until the hand is finshed. Really hate when I'm at a table and this takes place. Collusion is a stretch but it is the worse Poker etiquette you can display.
Results 11 to 20 of 105
Thread: Collusion?
-
03-24-2012, 10:53 AM #11
Last edited by MrPokerVerse; 03-24-2012 at 10:56 AM.
"When a man with money meets a man with experience, the man with experience leaves with money and the man with money leaves with experience." anonymous quote
-
03-24-2012, 10:54 AM #12
nothing is a big deal on PO. we get free poker money. so i guess that's enough?
issues are never resolved. but its free. how good can we expect something that's free to be?RANGER (B2B HU LOYALTY GAME CHAMP! DO YOU REMEMBER THOSE NOOB? NO, NO YOU DON'T!)
-
03-24-2012, 10:56 AM #13
a simple feature like carbon has to stop people talking once an all in has been bet would solve this issue...also would it still have been collusion if mr fury said i have TT BUT actually had say a AK??? end of the day bpm won the hand and its just client imo stop getting so worked up
17:51 <PooffyFooffy> not everyone screws up things the way I can20:27 <PooffyFooffy> I could use all the help I can get, lol<PooffyFooffy>lol I have my share of duh moments, regularly, lol
-
03-24-2012, 10:57 AM #14
20:52 <onehotdame> sug ...your the most helpful of Mods
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
-
03-24-2012, 10:58 AM #15
First off its unethical to talk about a hand during the hand. That goes without saying.
HOWEVER, you are talking about collusion, 2 guys getting together to try and create an advantage.
Collusion is an agreement between two or more persons, sometimes illegal and therefore secretive, to limit open competition by deceiving, misleading, or defrauding others of their legal rights, or to obtain an objective forbidden by law typically by defrauding or gaining an unfair advantage
Was there an unfair advantage if gimme did fold? No. Did you win the hand and win twice as much by him staying in? Yes. Did he actually do what he 'said he was going to do' - NO.
I think its not ethical and you shouldn't talk about your hand while you are in the hand, but it's a stretch to say they were colluding."And Shepherds we shall be. For thee, my Lord, for thee.
Power hath descended forth from Thy hand. Our feet may swiftly carry out Thy commands.
So we shall flow a river forth to Thee And teeming with souls shall it ever be.
In Nomeni Patri Et Fili Spiritus Sancti."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_AtUXdXA_s
-
03-24-2012, 11:05 AM #16
-
03-24-2012, 11:06 AM #17
-
03-24-2012, 11:08 AM #18
-
03-24-2012, 11:10 AM #19
As far as Mrfury saying his hand: Verbally disclosing the true contents of your hand will cause the hand to be killed and a penalty will be assessed.
He acted with no knowledge of gimme's hand so its not like he gained any advantage at all in this. Gimme knew what mrfury had and still called with a weaker hand. Not really a thing colluders do.
If you really want things to be done by the rules. Then mrfury's hand would have been killed and u wouldnt get the 2K of him. So you can send the 2K pts back to him
-
03-24-2012, 11:13 AM #20