i myself like a 6 man. i feel there is more money to be made, you can keep track of players easier, and its easier to play my style on a shorter table.
Printable View
i myself like a 6 man. i feel there is more money to be made, you can keep track of players easier, and its easier to play my style on a shorter table.
doest matter to me.
Both have there ups and downs and different playing styles required. Personally I'd prefer 6max due to the fact that you have more of a chance of manipulating your opponents stack in an optimistic hand.
I play 6 max Omaha but prefer full ring NLH
I prefer 6max, playing hyperturbo at pokerstars :P
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerDonV73
Just remember the more seats the more donks....good thing for some but not for others
I used to play a lot of 6 max. I enjoyed because the pace is much faster than full ring. The issue that i ran into was the fact that you have to be much more aggressive in 6max than in full ring. I found myself in worst spots much more often then in full ring. I was playing at very small stakes and playing multiple tables at once which also makes it harder. I have then switched to full so i can play more. I would say for one table 6 all day for anything over 5 tables full. Just my opinion though.
6 max is easier to play but 9 has more money to collect both have its advantages full ring is for full bankroll
It could be just me but I think 6max has more suck outs. on 9 I feel like my trips hit more and hold more often than not. I'm definitely a 9er
I like 6-max tables. I play PLO 6max, cash, or SNG. Or Heads-Up SNG ;-)