Is it just my imagination? Who feels like the things that shouldn't happen do more on Carbon and less on Juicy? :confused:
Printable View
Is it just my imagination? Who feels like the things that shouldn't happen do more on Carbon and less on Juicy? :confused:
I dont feel that way at all, I think Juicy is garbage compared too carbon.
I get bad beats on both, include Lock into that too.
carvon gives more flushes, juicy gives more gut shots. it balances out
I seem to get more pp over pp on juicy. I am sure it's our imaginations and it is balanced.
I really don't think there is much difference as for as random cards,,,I do like Carbon's software better.
I can't really give an opinion. I only play at carbon.
wagon... u seem to always know what to say.... I agree about the software... I wonder if all random chips are created equal?
of course they are different, they are on different networks
Carbon RNG definetly seems shady to me. You can call the cards half the time based on patterns. Seems like the flop turn river patterns off starting hand and arent random at all.
Tims, you are basing on your conspiracy theories on Carbon. If you apply your skills to a game that you're good at, you will be successful in the long run. Those people who win with crazy outrageous hands are usually bottom feeders who get lucky occasionally. Ignore them. Tom, of course they are different, you are basing 2 different networks however I have noticed that Juicy has had lot of badbeats going on than most sites as it seems. Just basing on my experiences. Carbon and pokerhost are great site to play and build br from. Good luck at the games.
I hate juicy. I will not play it unless I am going for B2B or grinder challenge.
They are on different networks so they're completely different.
and if you can call the cards half the time based on patterns, should you not win every freaking freeroll here that is run on Carbon? I don't get it. If I could call the cards half the time nobody could beat me, I would win 100% of the tournaments I enter. Lets say you are average, then you win 50% of the time that you cannot call the cards and then the other 50%, since you know the cards you would win 100% of the time or fold. Nobody should be able to come close to you.
Heres a example I try to see a hand with QJ but get priced out preflop.
Then Flop comes K,10,6.
Ive already folded but swear we know a A or 9 will turn.
That usually gives the guy with AK that priced me out 2pair vs the caller with his pocket 66
I guess Im crazy but I see these patterns far to often. Call them action hands or whatever but the times you see the A or 9 to hit that straight wether you got it in or folded it happen so often against the actual % that you have to be blind to not see it.
I know Im crazy.
sites deal the same 200 hands.
how can use carbon poker?
Play 10,000 hands on each. Write down the results, and let me know what you find.
I find wierd stuff happens on all sites. ex playing Poker stars yesterday and stud Hi/Lo.
I get dealt A23 all hearts seems solid. next two cards are the 4 and 5 of hearts so a natural straight flush and the best low hand >.<.
both sites are shaddy seems like best hand on flop always gets beat
unfortunately it does seem to be that way....
Perhaps this is the most accurate conclusion to my issue preposing post... Lol.... I believe it's random from the cards... and skill from the player... just sayin'
sir, that's why the turn and the river do make it harder to calculate after the flop.... holdem' isn't omaha.... but there's alot of strategy in the amount of your raise when you have a great flop.... if it's not a 90% pat win... don't bet too much... think more value... and keepin more players in... till you can see that river and KNOW if you can't be beat... then... the kill XXXX...... lol....
It "seems" is just not a good argument in favor of a site being rigged. I have not seen one person provide solid evidence that the cards are anything but random. What I do find strange though is that people continue to play on sites they claim are rigged.