I would say Carbon but ive heard great things about ACR. Considering moving my BR to ACR>
Printable View
I would say Carbon but ive heard great things about ACR. Considering moving my BR to ACR>
For U.S. I would have to say the merge network or ACR.
Bovada treats me well
There's not anywhere near enough traffic to make playing on ACR profitable.Quote:
Originally Posted by ipoopchips
The cash tables are softer than anywhere else I've ever played, but there's never usually more than 1-2 tables going at any particular level.
There really are no micro MTT's; the lowest regularly scheduled ones were $3-$5 buy ins.
I think the smallest SNG they have is $1, and it takes a while to fill.
ACR's smallest buyin is $1.50, so yeah not good for micro stakes
no good sites at all..that all are bogus..play at your own risk
i think carbon is best not only for america but for many other also i got choice to play on any network ne poker site still i have play most on carbon because of fun factor.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssuglia
Why the the traffic this low ? US players are restricted to a few sites, so I thought the traffic should be higher
Pokerstars is the best, i think!
Yea, wondering the same. Overall, I dont think a lot of people trust these small sites. Its kinda like carbon and its traffic. Its been around for a while, but still not a huge traffic. A lot of advertising has to do with it, some people have never heard of ACR that have played on ftp or stars.Quote:
Originally Posted by MIGO14