Supreme Court strikes down limits on overall federal campaign donations
So this means that a rich person could contribute the maximum amount towards every member of congress.
That's a bad idea in any case, but in particular, it is bad for online poker and online gambling in general. Sheldon Adelson, the multibillionaire casino owner has sworn to line the pockets of everyone in Washington in his bid to "protect children and problem gamblers" from the evils of online gambling. He's got the money, and he's got the will. He also has a troop of lackeys through whom he can contribute far more than the $2600 cap per election.
Mega-Donor Opens Wallet On The Hill To Kill Online Gambling
There could be darker days for online poker ahead than we have yet witnessed.
Results 21 to 25 of 25
Threaded View
-
04-06-2014, 10:34 AM #1
Why you should care about the Supreme Court's Ruling this week
I'm not slurring my words. I'm talking in cursive. I believe the ladies find it to be quite elegant.