who the worst winner main event?my choice is moneymaker or cada.
Printable View
who the worst winner main event?my choice is moneymaker or cada.
worse winner is in my opinion by far the poker brat(helmuth) he used to be good before the internet became huge and
everyone learned how to play. I believe it put him on MEGA PERMANENT TILT.
and to what you said moneymaker and cada are my favorite winners!!!! I wish Darvin Moon woulda made to first.
I like that anyguy can win concept, not just the major pros!!
The obv answer is Gold. He didn't just get lucky, he played terribly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Twiztedtony
Cada IS a major pro, he has been killing HU sngs for years before WSOP win.
i cant believe you think that of helmuth tony he is still putting up results and winning bracelets so how can you say hes tilted
i agree moneymaker hasnt done a thing since then
I can't say that Russ Hamilton brought any true skill to his bracelet win! Looked more like the luckiest guy that year!!!
-Stack
I'd argue Jerry Yang. Gold was pretty bad too tho.
Robert Varkonyi,and jerry yang is on my list luck winners all time world series.i like gold
Gold was by far the luckiest but he played an amazing mind game during that run...Whoever said Helmuth must be a Northern European idiot because hes still one of if not the best NLHE player alive...Jerry Yang was probably the worst but a really nice guy to meet in person.
I'd definitely go with Gold - if you watch his play, it looks like he was fumbling around every hand and just got unGODly lucky. Then he was a shit to his friend who staked him. And who's seen anything (poker-win-wise) since?
Robert Varkonyi and Jamie Gold
Robert Varkonyi was pretty bad too. Forgot all about him.Quote:
Originally Posted by deedbr
gold and yang diffinitely sucked and were lucky but hey need some luck too
id have to agree with gold being the worst only because he was the luckiest mother F'er
everything i see him doing is just passing around money around the table... He is one of my fav players too!! i wish he could pull together his game a little. maybe he has peaked
all im saying about helmuth is he has peaked. hes no longer the best. i still love to hear him bitch about being sucked out on thoQuote:
Originally Posted by poolsharkbps
Jerry "thank u jesus" Yang.....wtf why every 1 hatting on hellmuth....the guy is a beast
not hating.. but hes not the best... I like watching him, but i like seeing him tilt even more!! :)
I thing that Gold is the worst player.
Helmuth is over the top and he tilt becauso of the many worse players that win lucky.
The game is changed but Helmuth not
phil hellmuth won the 2013 WSOP this year dont read this if you dont want to see spoliers....opppsss
I agree!! he did play terribly!! i read some where he was selling his bracelet and that hes broke!! hmmmmm food for thought!Quote:
Originally Posted by IWASLION
See Yang was horrible, but he was actually a generous, likable guy, who knew he wasn't anything spectacular, so it's easy to be okay with him winning, especially since he is so charitable with his money.
Gold on the other hand, was greedy and selfish. He was unlikeable. And on top of everything else, he sucked and poker and didn't even know it.
What goes around comes around I guess. Yang invested a lot of money and is doing well on top of to fact he's being so charitable, and Gold had to sell his bracelet because he had too big of an ego to realize how bad of a player he was and it costed him $12,000,000+.
Very karma-tic.