just saying blocking communication from someone you would like to communicate with you is kinda shooting yourself in the foot
Printable View
just saying blocking communication from someone you would like to communicate with you is kinda shooting yourself in the foot
Well you need to read through the thread - the idea was not to block communication from everyone, as nowhere mentioned was a bubble or pm block. The idea is to punish people who are in default in terms of their abilities here - its not right for someone to be in default for weeks but continue to get marketplace loans, buy money with pts, etc. You don't need to be in main chat to settle a debt.
i do go innto default sometimes but most the time im good... but if i told you i make awesome brownies just some of the time i throw a little shit in there with them you probably wouldnt eat them so im in no way making excuses for fkd up behavior, but sometimes throwing stones at people when they are down wont help them get back up....
aww hell yeah...best idea yet jlynn...I'd rather throw stonez at dooshez
As Riv said you may want to read the thread in it's entirety. These enhancements are not about people like yourself who may go into default sometimes, nor about "throwing stones" at them. This thread is about other people whom turn around and thumb their noses at people they are in default too. These people are the ones who you see in chat all the time while in default whom upon getting asked when they might be settling up, they pick up boulders and throw them at the people whom loaned TO them.
Zab has promised in this thread some "changes" though it remains to be seen what those changes might be.
I'm in holding pattern at the moment......
but when you look at someone on wall of shame there is no differencec between an occasionally defaulter who is working on paying it back and a multi accounter who is working on more points for themselves.... so when someone says a person in default everyone even the people who are trying to get straight again would be effected... may different levels of negative feedback on defaults?