Ok, a while ago a member (who will remain nameless) and I were discussing a trade of me sending him $7 of Netspend in exchange for BCP. I thought there would be even trade but he said there's a rate typically for this where the BCP/ACR shipper makes profit. He says normally you only get %50 of the BCP/ACR funds of which which you traded for. So basically (I know you're all good with math but still...) I ship him $10 Netspend and he gives me $5 BCP/ACR...

THIS IS THE DUMBEST SHIT I EVER HEARD IN MY LIFE. IF ANYTHING, IT SHOULD BE THE OTHER WAY AROUND!!!!

I say this because, first off, a %50 differential is ridiculously high. I think it should be even trade but if anyone's going to make profit it should be the person sending the Netspend money because the Netspend person is trading REAL CASH that can be used IMMEDIATELY on anything his heart may desire as long as they accept Visa (and who doesn't?) as opposed to receiving virtual poker money that the withdrawer would have to wait on it he chose to use it for ANYTHING other than poker.

If you agree with this concept (or not), PLEASE explain to me how this should be considered fair practice???