I've checked the sports-betting sites and they all give you about $20.00 for every $100.00!!!
Printable View
I've checked the sports-betting sites and they all give you about $20.00 for every $100.00!!!
Sounds cool. I feel like an upset tonight tho...
On one hand, Manny is a stud and it would be hard to bet against him. On the other hand, Bradley is 28-0.
I wouldn't bet on this one myself, but if you do good luck.
Thanks!
Didn't see it but just heard it was a split decision ... Bradley
and bet on manny is not a luxury and this old man on his day he is coming in boxing
I didn't see this fight but I heard Pacquiao was destroying in the beginning.
I would'nt bet against an undefeated Boxer, no way. Although, count when his last fight was and his age and that will tell you when to go for it.
Bradley went strong in the later rounds and somehow won according to the judges. Boxing is such a setup-now a rematch november. wtf
It was a bad fight with Manny being good and the black guy submitting as usual but the judges are paid... Lost about $250.00 but it doesn't matter coz I know now not to bet or watch boxing gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg ggggggggggggggg
Yea, definetely not a good thing to bet on but a lot of the times its fairly obvious. Does anyone want to see Mayweather v Pacquiao now? I think Mayweather would destroy him. Boxing used to be so great, sad its going downhill.
I think my first time smoking hash was when I watched Evander Holyfield vs. Lennox Lewis...
I was so high I was thinking it was a big conspiracy and when Holyfield won it blew my mind... Such good times after that but if they do this kinda stuff then it must be a financial thing. They knew what they "were" doing, it's just they didn't think to go out of a good note.
i hav not really enjoyed watching boxing matches as much as boxing movies i need to see some tight boxing matches whch is an exciting match to watch plz recommend 4 me.
haha eq may cant be pacman in my opinion i dont thiunk theyll ever fight too bad itll be historic
nothing like the tyson days when you didnt have to worry about a split decision, tyson would ko peeps in the 1st or 2nd round, boxing was at it peak, tyson, holyfield, lennox lewis, even old foreman...boxing is not the same..
I liked Tyson a ton and saw most of his fights ... historically speaking though, that era really wasn't great. Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed some fights in that time.Quote:
Originally Posted by gametime74
Go back a generation or two from there and you had ... Muhammad Ali - Wikipedia
There is a great documentary about that era that should be seen by all boxing fans ... When We Were Kings (1996) - IMDb
YOUNG George Forman (champ) vs Ali ... aka "the Rumble in the Jungle"
Seen it. It was pretty BOSS.Quote:
Originally Posted by bmeelneg
yea tyson was awesome. ko every fight
i do not do sports betting, to many bad habits i can release even betting on a sure thing like this. Oh well, no way Manny loses, best boxer out there, 10x the man that Pretty Boy Floyd/Money Mayweather, whatever name he has now.
Mayweather would be a good fight but I'm not gonna take it seriously.Quote:
Originally Posted by billyjustin
Manny got robbed period i have watched this fight 3 times now and every time i had Manny Winning it!
I really don't know either.
Result was all sorts of wrong
Yeah this was insane. I have no idea how they gave Bradley the win. Manny should of won.
UFC>Boxing. There goes the mayweather/pacquiao fight people want to see. Boxing is going down, which sucks cause it used to be really good.
Try to bet on things I have control of regardless of the incentives. Even if I'm playing in a team sport or game would rather be betting on myself against who ever. Less variables that have to be controlled and one person to blame.
Yeah this is good ;) ....
Sounds cool. I feel like an upset tonight tho...
"the black guy".... lol
Rigged fights like this is why I dont get involved in betting. Love to watch , just no money on it.
Yeah, I saw that fight. Pacquiao should've won that fight lol. It was totally rigged. It showed it too lol. Very clear, he won that fight. Good thing I didn't bet any $$.. disappointing lol
yeah was some fishy decisions going on,i think now i heard they are investigating
manny was robbed, this is why boxing is becoming a thing of the past
I would never have bet on this one myself no matter who or what.
i had a feeling manny was gonna lose going into the fight, then was sure he won wen it was over, but then wen they announced that it was bradley i was like wtf? the arguments that support bradley are pretty convincing tho...all i know is manny is never gona get 50/50 with floyd now lol
Funny that Bob Arum is Manny's promoter and Bradley's promoter is,well, Bob Arum...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riSEb...&feature=share
don't believe the hype...it wasnt nearly as dominating as people are saying it was...bradley fought a godamn good fight
It's just body language.
Black ppl are used to getting hit coz they used to be called racoons so they know how to take a punch and make it seem like it didn't affect them.
Edit: Just seen the video.
Pacquiao was pushing him back the whole time but the Bradley guy was getting him with the jabs. It was a fight featuring a boxer vs. a slugger and I think the slugger won since he almost knocked Bradley down in the mid-rounds.
At the start of the fight, Manny was getting him with some good body shots and I think he knew his technical superiority so he just 'jogged' towards him the whole fight making the boxer use his jab or hooks.
In a boxing-match/fight, the guy who can counter with a straight or uppercut (the opponent is moving the head without localizing the feet) is usually the guy/girl dominating.
Having to resort to hooks and jabs aren't effective enough to win a fight on points unless it is in a dominating fashion (which it wasn't). Manny was able to plant his feet and hips repeatedly enough to land bigger shots---more times, something Bradley wasn't able to do.
Discuss.
lol thats sum funny shit!!
enjoyed the video ... I mean I know things can be edited to "prove" just about anything ... still it was good to see