Playing the 5:30 EST BCP PO game and we're at the final 11. Shortstack pushes all in for 345, it gets folded around to big blind who is 2nd chip stack and blinds are at 125/250...player delays (did not timeout) and then folds for 95 more chips...sorry, but that is the definition of collusion. NO ONE folds for 95 chips in the big blind Heads Up. I mean I got knocked out on bubble with KK to 83 because the chip leader only had to call for like 300 more chips and was big blind, which he IS supposed to do in that position (easy call rivdee :-) and nice runners lol). It's for a small prize pool, but the players here are supposed to be a lot more respectable even when playing a buddy. Winner takes more money, sorry to the friend that lost...it's just wrong, is all I'm really saying.
Results 1 to 10 of 35
Thread: Collusion or not collusion?
Hybrid View
-
08-05-2013, 06:42 PM #1
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Posts
- 631
Collusion or not collusion?
-
08-05-2013, 06:43 PM #2
I agree with this completely...it was a little suspect to say the least.
-
08-05-2013, 06:44 PM #3
i like the sex scenes......
In the beginning God said : "The four dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric second rank tensor equals zero", and at once there was light.
-
08-05-2013, 06:44 PM #4
-
08-05-2013, 06:45 PM #5
I have to agree this does sound collusion to me. BB should make this call no matter what 2 cards they have.
-
08-05-2013, 06:46 PM #6
not going to say it was collusion but if I saw someone fold for 95 more chips to put someone all in I would think collusion myself
-
08-05-2013, 06:47 PM #7
-
08-05-2013, 07:35 PM #8
It would be collusion if they were fully aware of the situation and just gave the guy a pass. But, it is common that people are doing other things like multi-tabling, changing their music, watching TV, having sex, and sometimes they just hit the wrong button. I know I have folded to the BB from the SB in error on more than one occasion when the BB was a sit-out
-
08-05-2013, 07:38 PM #9
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Posts
- 393
-
08-05-2013, 06:47 PM #10