Total Free Money Earned

Redeems: $280,439

BTC Rate: $80802.28

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 38

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    PokerOwned God Swittie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,789

    Angry AA eternal loser!!!

    just lost 7 times today with AA on pokerstars....is that fucking believeble???


    In the beginning God said : "The four dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric second rank tensor equals zero", and at once there was light.

  2. #2
    PokerOwned Admin Poof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    4,136
    that used to be me with kings, then I found out I was playing them wrong....

  3. #3
    PokerOwned God Swittie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,789
    Quote Originally Posted by PooffyFooffy View Post
    that used to be me with kings, then I found out I was playing them wrong....
    sorry but there is no such thing "playing them wrong",.... it doesnt matter if u slow play or raise or shove all in, the FACT is that they just dont beat the other hands, it isnt the way i play them that will change the cards that come on table, almost always some lucky tard hits a no less tard set, mostly on river, im starting do get little psycho with it, starting to run into little panic everytime i get them.... now i will adopt the politic "Fold them pre-flop" , i just dont wanna get in trouble anymore smileyshocked1.jpeg


    In the beginning God said : "The four dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric second rank tensor equals zero", and at once there was light.

  4. #4
    PokerOwned Pro
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    204
    Quote Originally Posted by Swittie View Post
    sorry but there is no such thing "playing them wrong",.... it doesnt matter if u slow play or raise or shove all in, the FACT is that they just dont beat the other hands, it isnt the way i play them that will change the cards that come on table, almost always some lucky tard hits a no less tard set, mostly on river, im starting do get little psycho with it, starting to run into little panic everytime i get them.... now i will adopt the politic "Fold them pre-flop" , i just dont wanna get in trouble anymore smileyshocked1.jpeg
    yeah you can play them wrong... if your trying to slow play them and limp in along with half the table then you greatly increase the chances that someone is gonna hit flop and beat you or give them draws, and if your not able to bet them off the draws because your still trying to slow roll them then that further increases your chances of getting beat. Your right you might be able to change the cards that come on the flop, but there is definitely stuff you can do to try and prevent those weak hands from seeing the flop in the first place

  5. #5
    PokerOwned God Swittie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,789
    Quote Originally Posted by abenz419 View Post
    yeah you can play them wrong... if your trying to slow play them and limp in along with half the table then you greatly increase the chances that someone is gonna hit flop and beat you or give them draws, and if your not able to bet them off the draws because your still trying to slow roll them then that further increases your chances of getting beat. Your right you might be able to change the cards that come on the flop, but there is definitely stuff you can do to try and prevent those weak hands from seeing the flop in the first place
    apparently u didnt read my post before answering........=/..........i said IT DOESNT MATTER THE WAY I PLAY THEM SLOW PLAY OR SHOVING ALL IN i always get unlucky,
    the last one i played for example, i was SB, everyone folds except BB, i only called BB 200, guy raises to 400, i call, flop comes 6, 10, 2 , guy shoves all in(and he was a joker with 7/2 all game) i called, turn 8, river Q, guy shows 6/6......happy?
    Last edited by Swittie; 09-15-2012 at 08:33 PM.


    In the beginning God said : "The four dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric second rank tensor equals zero", and at once there was light.

  6. #6
    PokerOwned Demi-God ssuglia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    811
    Quote Originally Posted by Swittie View Post
    sorry but there is no such thing "playing them wrong"
    There is absolutely such a thing as playing a hand wrong.

    Losing with AA a few times in a row? That's part of poker. I've seen players lose 20+ times in a row holding AA.

    If you are losing with AA more than you should over a large sample size, then yes you are playing them wrong in certain situations.

    20:52 <onehotdame> sug ...your the most helpful of Mods
    "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

  7. #7
    PokerOwned God Swittie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,789
    Quote Originally Posted by ssuglia View Post
    There is absolutely such a thing as playing a hand wrong.

    Losing with AA a few times in a row? That's part of poker. I've seen players lose 20+ times in a row holding AA.

    If you are losing with AA more than you should over a large sample size, then yes you are playing them wrong in certain situations.
    really?
    =PP


    In the beginning God said : "The four dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric second rank tensor equals zero", and at once there was light.

  8. #8
    PokerOwned Admin Poof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    4,136
    Quote Originally Posted by Swittie View Post
    sorry but there is no such thing "playing them wrong",....
    you are wrong. They are much more profitable for me since I learned how to play them.
    Ssuglia is right, if you are losing with AA or KK over a large sample size, the problem is not the hand.
    Last edited by Poof; 09-15-2012 at 12:06 PM.

  9. #9
    PokerOwned God Swittie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,789
    Quote Originally Posted by PooffyFooffy View Post
    you are wrong. They are much more profitable for me since I learned how to play them.
    Ssuglia is right, if you are losing with AA or KK over a large sample size, the problem is not the hand.
    its just a matter of luck.... i dont believe in this poker "dogmas"........


    In the beginning God said : "The four dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric second rank tensor equals zero", and at once there was light.

  10. #10
    PokerOwned Pro
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    202
    Quote Originally Posted by Swittie View Post
    its just a matter of luck.... i dont believe in this poker "dogmas"........
    This pretty much tells me all I need to know about your play.

    Also, post the HH (back me up here abenz) or it didn't happen imo.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •