HOPING U take a loook at this ZAB,, tyy

[rrickir]

http://www.americascardroom.eu/blog/...mNd7ZgqdRLk/1/ I saaw this on Facebook,, and in reading the article,,, it talks about how online poker is NOT illegal now,, since they reversed the wire act.....there are politicians who are trying to put it back,,, but that hasnt happpend yet..........IN reading this,,,,, I was jsut WONDERING,,,, ZAB if u seee this,,,,, if there was any way, u mite be able to bring back BCP games???? i always see other forums have thier games on bcp all time now,, and after reading this ar t i cle,,, thought MAYBE u could consider this also........txxx for r eadinggg

[Rambler]

I like the sound of this article! I hope BCP PO games can return too!

[Dalsue214]

New York Lawmakers are on the right side of the federal poker debate I saaw this on Facebook,, and in reading the article,,, it talks about how online poker is NOT illegal now,, since they reversed the wire act.....there are politicians who are trying to put it back,,, but that hasnt happpend yet..........IN reading this,,,,, I was jsut WONDERING,,,, ZAB if u seee this,,,,, if there was any way, u mite be able to bring back BCP games???? i always see other forums have thier games on bcp all time now,, and after reading this ar t i cle,,, thought MAYBE u could consider this also........txxx for r eadinggg

This has nothing to do with the return of WPN games on PokerOwned.

The company PokerOwned is with is only interested in being related to regulated gambling in states where they are fully legal (and regulated)

WPN is considered an offshore gambling company.

[rrickir]

i know this dalsue,,,,,, is jsut i heard a rumor,,, zab mite be reconsidering bcp is alll,,, so thoought wd be good to see, ITS NOT illegal anymore to even play online tho,,, id idnt even know the wire act was reversed, now,, so i jsut thought that was intersting,, and maybe a possibility now but IDK

[Poof]

It was never illegal to play, just to use US banks to deposit and withdraw. There was something they were trying to pass that would make it illegal, which might be that wire act, I am really not sure. I stopped paying attention and just go with it.

[madjek]

Definately would bring more traffic here, guess it all comes down to legality. Not sure exactly what was going on before that caused Zab and other places to pull their games from all the sites, but hopefully Zab can put games on wpn, would be great. Adelson is big problem and big hypocrite imo, doesn't want any competition, even when studies show online gambling HELPS land casinos.

[rrickir]

ya me too poooofy,, but i,m saying i didnt know,,,, they REVERSED the wire act now lol..... so not sure how that wd mattter to zab now,,, but maybe it couild...... dont know,, if we DONT ask

[Dalsue214]

It's not illegal. The only illegal part is for banks to knowingly process deposits and withdrawals.. which is if you've ever seen a deposit or a check.. it is usually an online clothing shop, etc. based overseas.

Regulated US gambling sites produce revenue for the states in which it is legal in.. which if I'm not mistaken is the only sites that RTR is interested in doing "new" business & freerolls with.

[madjek]

It's not illegal. The only illegal part is for banks to knowingly process deposits and withdrawals.. which is if you've ever seen a deposit or a check.. it is usually an online clothing shop, etc. based overseas.

Regulated US gambling sites produce revenue for the states in which it is legal in.. which if I'm not mistaken is the only sites that RTR is interested in doing "new" business & freerolls with.

rtr actually only has rakeback for nj sites, nothing for nevada or delaware. But question is does that have anything to do with just having fr's on another site. I'm sure rtr wants nothing to do with rb on wpn, but I'm just wondering if there would be an issue just having fr's on the site, no affiliate stuff, or do the 2 go hand in hand? If so then I am assuming this isnt going to happen as it is obvious rtr wants nothing to do with rb on these off shore sites. Just hoping having fr's with no loyalty stuff would bring more traffic and that alone would be enough to make it worth it.

[Dalsue214]

rtr actually only has rakeback for nj sites, nothing for nevada or delaware. But question is does that have anything to do with just having fr's on another site. I'm sure rtr wants nothing to do with rb on wpn, but I'm just wondering if there would be an issue just having fr's on the site, no affiliate stuff, or do the 2 go hand in hand? If so then I am assuming this isnt going to happen as it is obvious rtr wants nothing to do with rb on these off shore sites. Just hoping having fr's with no loyalty stuff would bring more traffic and that alone would be enough to make it worth it.

They offer a Rakeback deal for YaPoker (WPN for non-US)

They have nothing against WPN.