For overall, maybe.. but for weekly leaderboard, if they don't have at least 7 tournaments played, they won't be in the top tier if that makes sense..
Printable View
Yeah, you're probably right. Forget I even mentioned it :)
Though I agree that we shouldn't change the equation, maybe have a column for the number of tournaments people entered. That way if a debate arises, people can figure it out on their own :)
Ya there's not a good math formula to take into consideration # of tournaments played.
We might just list them (12 Tournaments Played)
Also, what to call this...
Maybe PokerOwned Player Rating?
There are established TLB equations out there already ...
1 PokerStars formula
2 Full Tilt Poker formula
3 UB Formula
Full Tilts would be..
ITM % + Entrants / Position = your rating
I think this would work and be much simpler
Couple Scenarios, both you got 6th place
30 entrants, 40% ITM = 70/6 = 11.66 Rating
30 entrants, 35% ITM = 65/6 = 10.83 Rating
25 entrants, 35% ITM = 60/6 = 10.00 Rating
Fishy you see any problems with this formula?
I just kinda quick scanned this the first time thru ... too much math ... not that I suck at math.
Anyways, am I reading this right? 7 tourneys in one week to qualify. 7 tourneys * 145 point = 1015 points a week minimum.
Or are you saying 7 tourney for the all time board (not the weekly board)?
I crashed this party late lol... I have some other input if you want it
There needs to be some sort of minimum or else the numbers won't be any good. Considering there are 3 tournaments a day (soon to be four) and 7 days a week that is 21-28 tournaments. This system would be good for the regulars, but do what I do: Use the donkey betting and last longer bets to make points. If you are pretty decent at poker, you may have to do very few surveys to pull 7 a week!